MultiCS Güncel multics r84 brutus-z fix

[matrix]

Which Site vps you are used ??

i can help to you for vps dedçated server

 

[bugti377]

i can help to you for vps dedçated server

i Just Ask Name of Site brother,

 

[arber02]

Profile 098d Not working on this

 

[mmru]

Profile 098d Not working on this

work wery well with zzz2 ver
Uptime: 00d 04:59:53
Load Average: 0.06 0.08 0.03 1/299
Free Memory: 1690 / 2983 MB (762 MB cached)
Linux Total CPU: 4.56%
Brutus Total CPU: 1.52%
Brutus Process CPU: 3.03%
Total Profiles: 49
Total Servers: 51
Total Cache Servers: 1
Total CCcam Servers: 1
Total Mgcamd Servers: 1
Total Camd35 Servers: 0
Total cs378x Servers: 0
NodeID = 5238345ad76986e9

Version: MultiCS r84 Brutus-z

Ziyaretçiler için gizlenmiş link,görmek için Giriş yap veya üye ol.

Ziyaretçiler için gizlenmiş link,görmek için Giriş yap veya üye ol.

204 ms​

41​

241 100%

241 100%

3995% 00%

25% 0%

0 / 10%

098D:0

 

[arber02]

Thanks i should be config problem

 

[arber02]

Brutus is an ugly multics for me it creates inner traffic with Brutus Process CPU once it goes more 20% freezes to hell start.

 

[sagher]

Brutus is an ugly multics for me it creates inner traffic with Brutus Process CPU once it goes more 20% freezes to hell start.

Brutus has backdoors like starsat boxes. they collect data and make forever server lolxx

 

[ytbsepty]

Oh good....

 

[Thor2013]

@ytbsepty what happened ?! Let's be serious, the brutus versions like Hb are very resource consuming compared to r81 or r82 .... In my opinion (and we are talking about the tests I did) the most successful version is multicsr100 all versions and versions created by evileys although the first are payable and I would never pay for a hobby ... Who pays is clearly Pay ...

 

[halloul]

Multics R107 created by Evileys is also very good

 

[ytbsepty]

yes thor i agree with you , but r 100 consuming more energy cpu

 

[ytbsepty]

yes thor i agree with you , but r 100 consuming more energy cpu

when i start r 100 without lines or any cache is stay up

 

[arber02]

Evileyes created r84 then r107 no other ones. The rest is not his.

 

[Thor2013]

Maybe I'm wrong, but from r69 which has an open source and up to r84, who takes the credit? I ask out of curiosity without any contradiction ....
I remember that the best cfg were Tiesto's .... Do you remember those times ?
What times were ....

 

[ytbsepty]

R69... Yes.. And r81 it was good

 

[Thor2013]

Respect Ytbsepty! Because "veterans who know, know!"

 

[ytbsepty]

Yes.. With sky it, UK.... 69 Best for nagra.... Ohhh what Times....

 

[sagher]

R69... Yes.. And r81 it was good

r69 makes some problem to decode HD and 4k channels. 81 and so on are good for this.

 

[arber02]

Im stuck for so many years to a r84 modified for sky de and have low ecm times, good cache, no infinite cycles to run out ram and everything else. New versions with iptables always with problems. Im one of the ones that used the first version of multic

 

[sagher]

use ufw as a iptable for easiest way...
use r100 public for cache on low ecm.
r81 is also a good choice.